During my last couple days
in Berlin, I did a free walking tour of the city with my hostel, visited the
outdoor memorials for victims of the Holocaust, and toured the Jewish Museum
and German History Museum. I observed each site attempting to understand the
way in which the city connected the present with its tragic past, from the
physical presentation of the memorials to their location and accessibility to
the public. I visited the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe (or the
Holocaust Memorial) first with the walking tour, which skipped over the
memorials to the other groups of victims. The Holocaust Memorial is clearly the
largest and most eye-catching. The tour guide gave us some history behind its
creation and the controversy over its presentation. At first glance there is no
way of knowing the purpose of the memorial, which is a collection of dark
rectangular slabs of stone, rising in height here and there arbitrarily. But
that is the point—a visitor can interpret the sea of pillars in any way he
wishes. It certainly makes a viewer think, and is not an aesthetically pleasing
monument that tourists flock to for a photo op. Critics have said that it does
not explain the horrors enough. I did not have an opinion on whether I believed
there were memorials worthier of creation, but it was definitely moving to walk
by myself among the pillars, especially in the middle where the slabs were forest-like
and tall enough that I couldn’t see past them.
The Memorial to the Sinti
and Roma Victims was located along more of a central path in the park, and was
the only memorial to clearly display information about the history behind the
memorial. A timeline on the victims’ persecution was exhibited on panels along a
wall. On walking through an entryway on the side of the wall, one found a clear
round pool with a stone triangle in the middle.
This final memorial was the
most relevant to my research. Under the year 1938, the panel read:
In December, Himmler issues a basic decree “to tackle
the Gypsy question on the basis of race” with the aim of finding a “final
solution to the Gypsy question”. By the end of World War II, the Research
Office for Racial Hygiene, which was given the task of registering Roma and
Sinti, has prepared some 24,000 “racial expert opinions”. These provide an
essential basis for deportation to killing centers.
The German Hygiene Museum
also offered more perspective on the underlying issue of eugenics behind the
actions of the Nazis. In fact, there was a whole section on Rassenhygiene, or racial hygiene. There was an introduction explaining the exhibit, and the biological terminology highlighted the idea of racial theory as having a scientific character:
"Nazi racial theory saw the German people as a biological unit. The point of racial hygiene was to preserve the German racial body from genetic degeneration due to amalgamation with the supposedly inferior races. At the same time healthy hereditary traits were to be encouraged by selective breeding and raising the birth-rate. The classification of people according to pseudo-scientific racial research could sometimes serve as the basis for life-and-death decision."
On display were many objects that served as propaganda,
spreading the idea that Jews were poisoning the bloodline of the German people.
Sterilization order for the child of a French soldier of North African descent. |
Overview chart explaining the Nuremberg racial laws. Charts illustrating hereditary doctrine were supposed to show the population the consequence of mixed marriages. |
Propaganda poster advocating racial hygiene. |
No comments:
Post a Comment